She’s one of the names being put forth by as a possible replacement for Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who announced his retirement this summer.
Not everyone is on board with this.
- Comment
- Reblog
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Dating Jesus 
I’m *still* in favor of putting Hillary Clinton on the Supreme Court.
Not because I have a crush on her or even agree with her on as much as I might agree with someone else.
But because I think she would do a good job and would cause the most brain and heart damage to the Foxoids.
You know, that would be an interesting pick. I’d love to sit through those confirmation hearings. I believe she’d handle herself fantastically.
Wrong.
Hillary is a center-left politician.
She would have been a better President then Obama and a better choice for the court then who we will get.
I’m betting on the protestant.
Just thinking about her at the Senate hearing for health care reform in — y’know — the late 1900s, not a note in front of her, speaking authoritatively and smartly — yeow.
And she got her head handed to her for that. Go figure.
Well of course. Just who did she think she WAS, that uppity……….. Never mind.
Thaaaat’s right. She should have remembered her place.
Back in the White House, baking cookies. And doing her hair. And standing by her man.
But maybe not changing the style so much…
Or wearing the headband. Good heavens no.
Lord, no. That would be wrong, too.
On the myth of “liberal judicual activism”:
I can spell “judicial,” really!
Go, and sin no more. You are forgiven.
Hey! Me, too? I’ve sinned and I could use a pass!
Thanks be to God!
Again, I read right over that. We don’t grade lower for speelings or misspeelings.
And not even potatoe* speelings.
*Dan Quayle’s version