For more on Charles Einstein, go here.
From Paul Froese, at Religion & Politics:
…economic perspectives are indelibly tied to religious cosmologies. Voters need not choose between God and mammon. Instead, they tend to see their money, the market, and the economy as a reflection of their God.
And thanks, Leftover, for this link.
Paul Buchheit at Common Dreams writes:
The standard argument against this is that everyone has an equal opportunity to benefit from past accomplishments. But it isn’t true. An American born in 1970 in the bottom economic quintile had only a 17% chance of making it into the top two quintiles. Reports from Brookings, Pew, and the OECD show that much of Europe has more economic mobility than the United States.
Even for those who headed up the newest computer-based technologies, their successes have depended on the input of thousands of physicists and chemists and chip designers and software engineers and market analysts over many years to lay the groundwork for the infrastructure and protocols needed for success.
And then he quotes Tom Paine:
All accumulation, therefore, of personal property, beyond what a man’s own hands produce, is derived to him by living in society; and he owes on every principle of justice, of gratitude, and of civilization, a part of that accumulation back again to society from whence the whole came.
Read Barry Levinson’s take on the economics of the comic titans. And thanks, DickG., for the link.
Those TANF benefits? Pres. Clinton’s answer to welfare? They fell to 20 percent below their 1996 levels in 34 states. And six states have cut them, according to a new report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Here’s a chart:
And more cuts are planned.
So what does this mean to you, a hardworking American? Well, you just may fall into the abyss, yourself. Or, if you’re blessed to have a job and lucky enough to be holding things together relatively well, you will start to see an increase in requests for public services. And if we don’t or won’t provide those, guess what happens? Emergency services get overtaxed (not in a tax-tax way, but in a used-tax sense) and you will see that in your household budget, maybe in higher insurance premiums or increased taxes to handle emergency medical calls from your neighbors who can’t afford an office visit, who wait to call their local fire department when things get so bad they just can’t suck it up any more. So really? While the Super Committee was a Super Failure, the safety net gets stretched to the point that you can drive city buses through the holes. I’m no math major, but looking out for those who can’t look out for themselves isn’t just the moral thing to do. It makes perfect economic sense.