Not Green Party candidate Jill Stein or Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, evidently, and Stein is crying foul.
Will a mano a mano between Clinton and Trump bring more ratings than adding the two other candidates? That’s a big question because at the end, the decision rests with shekels.
An organization I belong to and love, the League of Women Voters, once ran the debates, but backed away in 1988 over demands placed by the Commission on Presidential Debates, which was created in 1987 by the two major political parties.
As Leftover says (he sent these links), why don’t we let the nonpartisan LWV have control over the debates again? Where’s the harm in opening up the conversation?