Intersectional feminism, that is.
I don’t see in the design of an intersectional feminist curriculum any mention of class. I see identities, but the terms poor, poverty, and any mention of class structure are absent from the entire essay.
Intersectionality is essential to the understanding of structural oppression. However, without any focus on class structure, groups of people sharing common relations to labor, the means of production, and the marketplace within an economic system, (both existing and in theory), intersectionality, and intersectional feminism in particular, (critical social theory) becomes little more than an academic fad. The master narrative that empowers structural oppression remains, essentially, unchallenged. Intellectually. Critically.
If the goal of feminism is to create a new standard of care, (social relations), that is not subservient to that existing master narrative, an understanding of class structures and class theories must be part of the consciousness raising exercise (education). It’s been my impression, based on what I’ve read, Kimberlé Crenshaw understands that. I hope Ileana Jiménez does as well.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.