But we knew that already. The History Channel is airing “The Real Face of Jesus” before Easter.
Does it matter? Evidently, it does to some. But still.
And thanks, BuzzFeed, for the link.
-
Follow
Following
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Dating Jesus 
I think people just want to know that he was real, and worrying about his facial features or eye color is an offshoot of that desire.
Very strange that they found one guy who says that the weave and stitching is only found in Masada and not in the Middle Ages when others say that the form of weaving wasn’t known until the Middle Ages. The cloth has been recreated btw using methods known in the Middle Ages.
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2251735/shroud_of_turin_fake_and_scientist.html
Oooh, interesting!
This is why historians consider the History Channel to be shit, sensationalist history created solely for revenue and not for academically integrid reasons.
I concur about the lack of integrity in The History Channel. I loathe those Jesus programs at Christmas and Easter times.
O.K. I get it. I don’t watch the Hitler Channel, but I posted that because I’m always nonplussed (SAT word!) at concern over what Jesus looked like. He didn’t look like the Jesus I worshipped growing up. I know that much. And I figure I’ll see his face and know him when I see him, later.
Is integrid the adjective form of integrity? I have wondered what it would be but have been too lazy to look it up.